Post by joitarani99 on Mar 14, 2024 4:01:20 GMT
Taking this into account it is not so important what the maximum limits for virtual machines are. But it should be emphasized that rare real corporate installations of virtualization systems contain thousands and even more so tens of thousands of virtual machines. Therefore the realism of the maximums declared by the manufacturer as well as the ability to work stably on installations with hundreds and several thousand virtual machines are much more important. Lets summarize For convenience I put the pros and cons of the solutions I found in a table.
Pros Cons zVirt ORION soft Installation from the distribution High level of customization and a large number Buy Email List of settings Wide range of functions Selfservice portal Very voluminous documentation with inconvenient navigation Inconvenient interface Quite a high entry threshold Many nonobvious aspects of Viola operation Basalt SPO Simplicity and convenience installations Good documentation due to the very wide Proxmox community Presence of most of the functions that VMware administrators are used to Good architectural solution each node can be a control server The contribution of the Basalt SPO company is only support.
Clusters in one system the impossibility of migrating between clusters It was not possible to find information about any collaborations with manufacturers of domestic backup and VDI systems. There are some rough edges in the functions lack of a load balancer the need to use OVS to fully work with the network VMmanager ISPsystem Userfriendly interface Interface and ease of working with the product Approach do your own Good documentation Roadmap vendor support during testing Relatively low entry barrier Ecosystem approach and integrations Some important functions are still in the process of implementation.
Pros Cons zVirt ORION soft Installation from the distribution High level of customization and a large number Buy Email List of settings Wide range of functions Selfservice portal Very voluminous documentation with inconvenient navigation Inconvenient interface Quite a high entry threshold Many nonobvious aspects of Viola operation Basalt SPO Simplicity and convenience installations Good documentation due to the very wide Proxmox community Presence of most of the functions that VMware administrators are used to Good architectural solution each node can be a control server The contribution of the Basalt SPO company is only support.
Clusters in one system the impossibility of migrating between clusters It was not possible to find information about any collaborations with manufacturers of domestic backup and VDI systems. There are some rough edges in the functions lack of a load balancer the need to use OVS to fully work with the network VMmanager ISPsystem Userfriendly interface Interface and ease of working with the product Approach do your own Good documentation Roadmap vendor support during testing Relatively low entry barrier Ecosystem approach and integrations Some important functions are still in the process of implementation.